...
Files being submitted are in a shared Google folder.
Instructor wants to provide inline feedback that will stay with the student’s work versus being stored in Canvas.
Students will be peer reviewing each others’ work providing inline feedback and suggested edits.
Students will be returning to the document to:
Update for revised submissions,
Add new content (e.g. journals with multiple entries), or
Reference for future assignments, study guides, or professional application.
For an example of instructions when using the Website URL Submission in a course, see Website URL and Text Entry Google Doc Submission Examples.
Canvas Submission Type Setting | Student Submission View |
Advantages | Disadvantages | Cautions |
Students can paste the URL in the space provided without the extra steps of making it a hyperlink. Canvas does that conversion automatically. | Students can see additional submission options (Google Drive and Google Drive (LTI 1.3)), which may be confusing to the student or complicate grading and feedback functions for the instructor. | Students must have properly shared the Google file so someone with the link can either:
|
A “Comments” area below the URL submission allows students to provide additional text commentary in response to prompts. The “Comments” entry space appears small, but expands to allow for large amounts of text. |
...
Instructor wants to provide inline feedback that will stay with the student’s work versus being stored in Canvas.
Students will be peer reviewing each others’ work providing inline feedback and suggested edits.
Students will be returning to the document to:
Update for revised submissions,
Add new content (e.g. journals with multiple entries), or
Reference for future assignments, study guides, or professional application.
For an example of instructions when using a Text Entry submission in a course, see Website URL and Text Entry Google Doc Submission Examples.
Canvas Submission Type Setting | Student Submission View |
|---|---|
...
Advantages | Disadvantages | Cautions |
|---|---|---|
Students can either paste the URL in full as text or can create a hyperlink using the “External Link” option in the editor. | Students need to take extra steps to create their hyperlink to the file. | Students must have properly shared the Google file so someone with the link can either:
|
Instructors can provide in-line feedback directly on the student’s work. | Functionality of Speedgrader is limited. |
Google LTI 3.1 Submission
...
Advantages | Disadvantages | Cautions |
|---|---|---|
Students can work from a standard template or form. | Students can see additional submission options (Google Drive and Google Drive (LTI 1.3)), which may be confusing to the student or complicate grading and feedback functions for the instructor. | Rubric, if used, must be added via Google. |
In-line Inline feedback available and viewable with grade in Canvas through the Speedgrader tool. | In-line Inline feedback does not stay with the student’s copy of the document, which can impact a student if they are making updates or building content over time or over multiple assignments. | Students will need to connect their Google Account the first time they use the Google LTI 3.1. |
...
Advantages | Disadvantages | Cautions |
|---|---|---|
Instructors can provide inline feedback in Canvas during grading through the Speedgrader tool. | If the student selects "Google Doc" instead of Google Drive LTI, they may get a lot of "Unknown Folder" options. We aren't 100% sure what makes some folder folders "unknown." | In-line feedback does not stay with the student’s copy of the document, which can impact a student if they are making updates or building content over time or over multiple assignments. |
If the student selects "Google Drive" instead of the "Google Drive LTI," they get ONLY their "My Drive" files. | ||
If the student selects 'File Upload," the only option is local files on their computer. |
...