This article reviews creating a holistic learning framework through information & ideas, experience, and reflective dialogue.

In L. Dee Fink's book, "Creating Significant Learning Experiences", he argues that in order to create a complete set of learning activities capable of achieving significant learning, we need an enlarged and more holistic view of active learning - one that includes “getting information and ideas” as well as “experience” and “reflection.” The figure below illustrates his conceptualization of active learning, one that makes all three modes of learning an integral part of a more complete set of learning activities.

Fink states that "two principles should guide the choice of learning activities. First, an effective set of learning activities is one that includes activities from each of the three components of active learning (information and ideas, experience, and reflective dialogue). Second, we should try to find direct kinds of learning activities, whenever possible. Indirect, or vicarious, forms may be necessary in some cases, but when we can find direct ways of providing active learning, the quality of student learning expands." Some examples of direct learning activities for each category are:

A chart showing the 3 areas of Fink's holisitc view of active learning, including Experience, Information and Ideas, and Reflective Dialogue.

An Example of Holistic Learning in an Online Course

Below is an example of how one instructor incorporated the ideas of Holistic Learning to create an activity for her course. 

Course: Survey of British Literature

Information and Ideas: During class, the instructor uses lectures and class discussions to help students understand the basic elements of the texts (plot, character, style, etc.). 

Experience: Students are asked to participate in a simulated “online conference” mediated through the Learning Management System's discussion board.  Each student presents a paper about one of the texts in the course and other students must post three substantial responses (via the discussion board) in a style consistent with the kind of feedback that a scholar would get at a conference, resulting in responses that are quite “meaty.”  The dialogue that ensues is rich and is not mediated by the instructor, though she provides individual feedback through the grade book after the discussion is done.

Reflective Dialogue: Students write 1-2 paragraphs after the conference to reflect on how their thinking about their own paper and the text changed through the discussion. 

Advantages

Potential Issues

Additional References